STAGES: Difference between revisions

From MARINA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
<h4></h4>
<h4></h4>
<br/>
<br/>
  <h3>LESSONS LEARNED</h3><ul><li>How can the project contribute to improve the quality of the marine environment?</li><p align='justify'>Through the implementation of the MSFD and the achievement of the GES status.
  <h3>LESSONS LEARNED</h3><ul><li><b>How can the project contribute to improve the quality of the marine environment?</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>Through the implementation of the MSFD and the achievement of the GES status</p><ul><li><b>Link to more info on the oucomes</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>http://www.stagesproject.eu/images/STAGES/deliverables/STAGES_D4.2.pdf</p><ul><li><b>What RRI-related difficulties were encountered?</b></li></ul><p align='justify'></p><ul><li><b>Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties</b></li></ul><p align='justify'></p>
Through the development of a MSFD multi-stakeholder community.
Through a proposal and recommendations for a Science-Policy interface (SPi) to support MSFD implementation
</p><ul><li>Link to more info on the oucomes</li><p align='justify'></p><ul><li>What RRI-related difficulties were encountered?</li><p align='justify'></p><ul><li>Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties</li><p align='justify'>http://www.stagesproject.eu/images/STAGES/deliverables/STAGES_D4.2.pdf</p></ul>
<br/>
<br/>


Line 67: Line 64:
       |general_description=
       |general_description=
       |duration=2012-2014
       |duration=2012-2014
       |project_coordinator=tiago.garcia@eurocean.org
       |project_coordinator=managementmarina@gmail.com
       |fundings_framework= FP7
       |fundings_framework= FP7-ENVIRONMENT
       |website= http://www.stagesproject.eu
       |website= http://www.stagesproject.eu/
       |eu_member_state=
       |eu_member_state=
       |non_eu_states=
       |non_eu_states=
       |marine_region_focus=  Baltic Sea Black Sea Barents Sea Bay of Biscay and Iberian Coast Celtic Sea Greater North Sea including Kattegat and English Channel Greenland Sea Mediterranean Sea North-East Atlantic Sea Norwegian Sea Macaronesia Sea  
       |marine_region_focus=  Baltic Sea Black Sea Barents Sea Celtic Sea Greater North Sea including Kattegat and English Channel Greenland Sea Mediterranean Sea North-East Atlantic Sea Norwegian Sea Macaronesia Sea  
       |marine_related_issues= Pollution caused by human, land and sea pressures Deep sea mining including bio-prospecting Fishing and aquaculture Acidification  
       |marine_related_issues= Pollution caused by human, land and sea pressures Deep sea mining including bio-prospecting Fishing and aquaculture Acidification  
       |sectors=Oil and gas Waste management Fisheries Aquaculture Transport Minerals and metals  
       |sectors=Oil and gas Waste management Fisheries Aquaculture Minerals and metals  
       |themes=Non-indigenous species Marine litter Eutrophication Biodiversity  
       |themes=Non-indigenous species Marine litter Eutrophication Biodiversity  
       |stakeholders_involved=
       |stakeholders_involved=
  |keywords=Science-Policy interface, MSFD, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, GES, Good Environmental Status, environmental indicators, knowledge transfer, policy makers, researchers, scientists, governance
  |keywords=Science-Policy interface, MSFD, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, GES, Good Environmental Status, environmental indicators, knowledge transfer, policy makers
}}
}}
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>

Revision as of 07:21, 19 October 2017

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive is designed to deliver Good Environmental Status (GES) in EU marine waters by 2020. This Directive requires that Member States (MS) with marine territories put in place measures to achieve and maintain GES within a defined timeframe and according to eleven key descriptors of environmental status. However, there is a significant knowledge deficit which may hinder full implementation of the MSFD and the achievement of GES in EU waters. STAGES (Science and Technology Advancing Governance on Good Environmental Status) project is designed to directly address this knowledge deficit. The project has two overarching goals: i) to synthesise per major MSFD themes the information from research projects and ii) to develop a platform to ensure that the knowledge generated through European science and technology can be channelled to a broad range of relevant end users, to inform and facilitate implementation of the MSFD and the achievement of GES. To achieve this, STAGES will target a number of critical gaps in the knowledge transfer process. Firstly, STAGES will identify and synthesize relevant existing EU research results and make them available in a usable format for decision and policy making authorities. Through comprehensive scientific foresight targeted at MSFD knowledge gaps, STAGES will identify needs for further research. STAGES will also develop innovative solutions to achieve an effective collaboration between the broad range of stakeholders necessary to support MSDF implementation, including policy and governance, science, industry and civil society. Moreover, the role and input of MSFD stakeholders will be central to the activities of the project and to the proposals for a science policy interface which will be delivered by the project. The partnership has been constructed to include a combination of EU/international organizations which can represent a broad constituency of MSFD stakeholders, and national organizations with responsibility to support research and provide advice on MSFD implementation at MS level.


RRI FOCUS

Ranking of the most relevant RRI dimensions, where 6 is the most relevant to the project

  • Public Engagement
  • Gender Equality
  • Science Education
  • Open Access
  • Ethics
  • Governance


PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRI

Which are the most relevant project outcomes (roadmaps, guidelines, documents, reports, articles, videos etc) in terms of RRI?


LESSONS LEARNED

  • How can the project contribute to improve the quality of the marine environment?

Through the implementation of the MSFD and the achievement of the GES status

  • Link to more info on the oucomes

http://www.stagesproject.eu/images/STAGES/deliverables/STAGES_D4.2.pdf

  • What RRI-related difficulties were encountered?

  • Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties


POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED


    Main policy briefs produced by the project and related URL
    Policy brief 1
    Policy brief 2
    Policy brief 3
    Policy brief 4
    Policy brief 5
    STAGES
    Duration 2012-2014
    Project coordinator managementmarina@gmail.com
    Fundings framework FP7-ENVIRONMENT
    Website http://www.stagesproject.eu/
    Marine Region Focus Baltic Sea Black Sea Barents Sea Celtic Sea Greater North Sea including Kattegat and English Channel Greenland Sea Mediterranean Sea North-East Atlantic Sea Norwegian Sea Macaronesia Sea
    Marine Related Issues Pollution caused by human, land and sea pressures Deep sea mining including bio-prospecting Fishing and aquaculture Acidification
    Sectors Oil and gas Waste management Fisheries Aquaculture Minerals and metals
    Themes Non-indigenous species Marine litter Eutrophication Biodiversity
    Keyword(s) Science-Policy interface, MSFD, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, GES, Good Environmental Status, environmental indicators, knowledge transfer, policy makers