Ethical governance: Difference between revisions

From MARINA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
“Institutionalising ethics debate in terms of the implementation of standards in research ethics in science, technology and innovation policies”<ref> Brom et al. 2015: 15</ref>
“Institutionalising ethics debate in terms of the implementation of standards in research ethics in science, technology and innovation policies”<ref> Brom et al. 2015: 15</ref>


Governance is categorised as follows<ref>European Commission (2015f): Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation (MoRRI): Analytical Report on the Dimensions of Research and Innovation Governance. Sub-task 2.5, deliverable D2.4.2.</ref>:
Governance is categorised as follows<ref>European Commission (2015): Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation (MoRRI): Analytical Report on the Dimensions of Research and Innovation Governance. Sub-task 2.5, deliverable D2.4.2.</ref>:
* [[Discretionary governance]]
* [[Discretionary governance]]
* [[Corporatist governance]]
* [[Corporatist governance]]

Revision as of 02:24, 11 July 2018

“Institutionalising ethics debate in terms of the implementation of standards in research ethics in science, technology and innovation policies”[1]

Governance is categorised as follows[2]:

See also...

Ethics

References

  1. Brom et al. 2015: 15
  2. European Commission (2015): Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation (MoRRI): Analytical Report on the Dimensions of Research and Innovation Governance. Sub-task 2.5, deliverable D2.4.2.