MARLISCO: Difference between revisions

From MARINA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(67 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<table width="100%">
<table width='100%'>
<tr>
<tr>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<td width='75%' valign='top'>
==GENERAL DESCRIPTION==
<h3>GENERAL DESCRIPTION</h3>
<p style="font-size:95%">the consequences of societal behaviour in relation to waste production and management on marine socio-ecological systems, to promote co-responsibility among the different actors, to define a more sustainable collective vision, and to facilitate grounds for concerted actions through the successful implementation of the MMLAP (Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Action Plans on societal challenges). The main focus was to provide and evaluate mechanisms to enable society to perceive the impact of litter on the marine environment, to identify the land-based activities that are involved and collectively arrive at solutions to reduce that impact – in particular solutions that can be implemented locally but have a regional effect. MARLISCO’ s overarching goal was to raise public awareness, facilitate dialogue and promote co-responsibility among the different actors towards a joint vision for the sustainable management of marine litter across all European seas. MARLICO activities took place in the four European Regional Seas: North-East Atlantic, Baltic, Mediterranean and Black Sea, by a consortium with members located in 15 coastal countries.
<hr>
</p>
<p style='font-size:95%'>The main objectives of the MARLISCO project are to increase the awareness of the consequences of societal behaviour in relation to waste production and
management on marine socio-ecological systems, to promote co-responsibility
among the different actors, to define a more sustainable collective vision, and to
facilitate grounds for concerted actions through the successful implementation of
the MMLAP (Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Action Plans on societal
challenges). The main focus was to provide and evaluate mechanisms to enable
society to perceive the impact of litter on the marine environment, to identify the
land-based activities that are involved and collectively arrive at solutions to
reduce that impact – in particular solutions that can be implemented locally but
have a regional effect.
<br>
<br>
MARLISCO’ s overarching goal was to raise public awareness, facilitate dialogue
and promote co-responsibility among the different actors towards a joint vision
for the sustainable management of marine litter across all European seas.
MARLICO activities took place in the four European Regional Seas: North-East
Atlantic, Baltic, Mediterranean and Black Sea, by a consortium with members
located in 15 coastal countries.</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<h3>RRI FOCUS</h3>


==RRI FOCUS==
<h4>Ranking of the most relevant RRI dimensions, where 6 is the most relevant to the project</h4>
===In terms of RRI, what were the main challenges addressed, and to what extent were those challenges met by the project?===
* Public engagement {{#rating:1|6}}<br/>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
* Gender Equality {{#rating:0|6}}<br/>
<h4>Challenge 1 description</h4>
* Science education {{#rating:2|6}}<br/>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">How can the public and stakeholders be engaged on a complex, multidisciplinary and wide-ranging topic such as Ocean ecosystem services, in a way which consults them on their views and mobilises them to take action at national and European level?</div>
* Open Access {{#rating:0|6}}<br/>
</div>
* Ethics {{#rating:0|6}}<br/>
<!-- Copy the below code up to the point where it says end of code and paste it just below it -->
* Governance {{#rating:4|6}}<br/>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>How Challenge 1 was addressed</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society. </div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>What is the Best Practice for this Challenge?</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">Sea for Society developed a unique consultation methodology using ‘Collective Intelligence’ – a collaborative process to help groups in dealing effectively with complex issues such as the barriers and opportunities associated with sustainable marine ecosystems. Document: Consultation Methodology </div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>Name at least one Lesson Learned from this Challenge?</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">One of the main outcomes of the consultation was that attitudes and awareness are the main barriers to achieving a Blue Society, and in order to change these attitudes and increase awareness, citizens and stakeholders must come together in mobilisation actions. Document: Consultation Outcomes </div>
</div>
===Ranking of the most relevant RRI dimensions, where 6 is the most relevant to the project===
*Public Engagement {{#rating:6|6}}
*Gender Equality {{#rating:0|6}}
*Science Education {{#rating:5|6}}
*Open Access {{#rating:0|6}}
*Ethics {{#rating:0|6}}
*Governance {{#rating:4|6}}
<br/>
<br/>
 
<h3>PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRI</h3>
==PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRI==
<hr>
===Which are the most relevant project outcomes (roadmaps, guidelines, documents, reports, articles, videos etc) in terms of RRI?===
<h4>Which are the most relevant project outcomes (roadmaps, guidelines, documents, reports, articles, videos etc) in terms of RRI?</h4> <div style='border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf; background-color: #CFECEC;'><h4>Output1</h4>MARLISCO Marine Litter Database</div><div style='border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;'><b>URL: </b>http://www.marlisco.eu/deliverable-68.en.html</div><div style='border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;'>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf; background-color: #CFECEC;">
<b>Exploitable by GeneralPublic: </b>The MARLISCO project has tried all along the way to find the most suitable means of translating scientific findings into information that key target groups and stakeholders can understand and integrate into their activities.</div><br><br>
'''Outcome 1:''' Sea for Society Consultation Outcomes
<h3>LESSONS LEARNED</h3><hr><ul><li><b>What RRI-related difficulties were encountered?</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>The major challenge of the MARLISCO project was the number and diversity of activities to enable society to perceive the impact of marine litter across Europe.
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"></div>
</p><ul><li><b>Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>http://www.marlisco.eu/results.en.html</p><ul><li><b>How can the project contribute to improve the quality of the marine environment?</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>MARLISCO project has brought together different actors in society and their perception of the problem of marine litter, generating solutions to stop the impact of marine litter in European countries.</p><ul><li><b>Link to more info on the oucomes</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>http://www.marlisco.eu/results.en.html</p>
</div>
<h3>POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED</h3><hr><ul><li><b>Were policy makers involved in the project and to what extent?</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>Actions and policies specifically designed to deal with marine litter reduction may be associated with legally-binding or ‘hard’ mechanisms</p><ul><li><b>What were the challenges involved?</b></li></ul><p align='justify'>http://www.marlisco.eu/review-of-existing-policies-that-may-be-applied-to</p>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
'''URL:''' [http://seaforsociety.eu/np4/13/ Sea for Society Outcome 1]
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"></div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
'''Description:''' The Sea for Society Consultation showed that the Barrier Theme ‘Attitudes and Awareness’ (defined as ‘unfounded attitudes and lack of awareness of marine issues’) is perceived as the single biggest obstacle to a sustainable marine ecosystem, both for the EU as a whole and across different EU regions...
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">The second most influential Barrier Themes identified by stakeholders are ‘Governance and Strategy’ (defined as ‘responsible institutional framework strategies, policy and research for marine ecosystems’) and ‘Knowledge’ (defined as ‘inadequate scientific and general public knowledge’). The overall result is a ‘hierarchy of Barrier Themes’ which allowed the project to identify the ‘Cross Cutting Challenge’ – that is, the effort required to overcome the most influential Barrier Theme in the most effective way and, in turn, help to overcome all the Barriers below it in the hierarchy. Therefore the most important ‘Blue Society Challenge’ for the Sea for Society Project was to ‘Change Attitudes’ and ‘Improve Awareness’ around the issue of marine ecosystem services. Other key outcomes include specific stakeholder recommendations and issue reports by country.</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
'''Exploitable by researchers:''' These outcomes provide direct recommendations for lines of research to be taken, and indicate the ways in which researchers can address barriers to a Blue Society directly.
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify"></div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
'''Exploitable by policymakers:''' These outcomes provide direct recommendations for research and governance, and indicate the ways in which policymakers can address barriers to a Blue Society directly.
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify"></div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
'''Exploitable by other stakeholders:''' The outcomes can be used by all stakeholders involved in Ocean issues as a guideline of how to work better together in order to address barriers to a Blue Society.
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify"></div></div>
<br/>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;background-color: #CFECEC;">
<h3>Outcome 2 Title</h3>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"> Sea for Society Consultation Methodology</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>URL</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">[http://seaforsociety.eu/np4/13/ Sea for Society Outcome 2]</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>Description</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">A Consultation Process was designed and undertaken to engage stakeholders (those directly and indirectly dependent upon the sea for their livelihoods) and Citizen-Youth (private citizens between the ages of 18 – 25 whose livelihoods did not depend on the Sea). This consultation employed the methodology of ‘Collective Intelligence’ – a collaborative process to help groups in dealing effectively with complex issues such as the barriers and opportunities associated with sustainable marine ecosystems. The scale of the Sea for Society consultation process was ground-breaking, engaging 537 individuals face-to-face in lengthy consultations in 9 countries in Europe – never before had stakeholders and citizens been engaged in dialogue on Ocean topics across Europe in this way. The outcomes of the consultations were unique and innovative because they presented, for the first time, a comprehensive and complex picture of the challenges for a Blue Society.</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>Exploitable by researchers</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">Researchers can use the consultation methodology for engaging and informing the public and policy makers about the effects of their science on marine environments.</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>Exploitable by policymakers</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">The consultation methodology defines a way that multi-stakeholder dialogue can inform policy at national and European level, from research policy to marine governance.</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"  style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>Exploitable by general public</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify"> This methodology enables the general public to have their say alongside stakeholders in issues related to Ocean topics.</div>
</div>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;">
<h4>Exploitable by other stakeholders public</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify"> Social scientists and institutions for informal education in particular can benefit from the methodology as a way to open up the dialogue for RRI to take place.</div>
</div>
<br/>
 
==LESSONS LEARNED==
* '''What unexpected RRI-related difficulties did this project encounter, and how were these overcome?'''
<p align="justify">The major unexpected challenge of Sea for Society was the wealth of data that the Consultation produced. By entering into dialogue with citizens and stakeholders, we produced extremely valuable content well beyond what we anticipated. The data not only provided solutions to barriers but also gave insight into policy recommendations and many interesting conclusions were drawn by comparing outcomes across geographical areas. As such, the project timeline had to be adapted to make time for additional analysis.</p>
* '''Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties'''
<p align="justify">SFS Final Report (to be uploaded)</p>
* '''How can the outcomes of this project support work towards improved marine status?'''
<p align="justify">This project defined the Blue Society concept in a collaborative, multi-stakeholder way, building on the work done at European level by other projects and sparking partnerships and working relationships which continue to be exploited.</p>
* '''Link to more info on the outcomes'''
<p align="justify">[http://seaforsociety.eu/np4/20/ Sea for Society Outcomes]</p>
<br/>
<br/>


==POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED==
<td width='25%' valign='top'>
* '''Were policy makers involved in the project and to what extent?'''
<p align="justify">Actions and policies specifically designed to deal with marine litter reduction may be associated with legally-binding or ‘hard’ mechanisms </p>
*''' What were the challenges involved '''
[http://www.marlisco.eu/review-of-existing-policies-that-may-be-applied-to Review of Existing]
 
<br/>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td colspan="4"><b><font color="#000000">Main policy briefs produced by the project and related URL</font></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 1</td><td>[http://seaforsociety.eu/np4/21/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=14&fileName=Blue_Society_Policy_Brief1.pdf Blue Society Policy Brief]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 2</td><td>[http://seaforsociety.eu/np4/21/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=14&fileName=Blue_Society_Summary_Document1.pdf Blue Society Summary Document]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 3</td><td>[http://ebcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/European-Youth-Parliament-Declaration.pdf European Youth Parliament Declaration]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 4</td><td>[http://www.blue-society.net/business-communities-and-organization-commitment/?lang=en Blue Society Stakeholders Commitment]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 5</td><td>[http://seaforsociety.eu/np4/21/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=14&fileName=BlueSocietyA4CitizenPromise1.pdf Blue Society Citizen's Promise]</td>
</tr>
</table>
 
</td>
<td width="25%" valign="top">
{{Best Practices   
{{Best Practices   
       |name=MARLISCO               
       |name=MARLISCO               
       |logo=                                        
       |logo=                                          
       |general_description=
       |general_description=
       |duration=2012-2015
       |duration=2012-2015
       |project_coordinator=patrizia.grifoni@irpps.cnr.it
       |project_coordinator=Provincia di Teramo, Italy
       |fundings_framework=FP7
       |fundings_framework= FP7
       |website=http://www.marlisco.eu
       |website= http://www.marlisco.eu  
       |eu_member_state=Belgium, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, UK
       |eu_member_state=
       |non_eu_states=Norway
       |non_eu_states=
       |marine_region_focus=Baltic Sea, Bay of Biscay and Iberian Coast, Celtic Sea, Greater North Sea including Kattegat and English Channel, Mediterranean Sea, North-East Atlantic Sea, Norwegian Sea
       |marine_region_focus= Baltic Sea Black Sea Mediterranean Sea North-East Atlantic Sea  
       |marine_related_issues=Sea Transportation, Marine Change caused by Climate, Blue energy [Renewable Energy (wave, wind, tidal)], Maritime, coastal and cruise tourism, Coastal Urbanisation, Fishing and Aquaculture, Pollution caused by human, land and sea pressures, Blue Growth
       |marine_related_issues= Pollution caused by human, land and sea pressures Maritime, coastal and cruise tourism Coastal urbanization Fishing and aquaculture
       |sectors=Waste management,Education and Research,Marine Protected Areas
       |sectors=Waste management Education and Research Marine Protected Areas  
       |themes=Marine litter
       |themes=Marine litter  
       |stakeholders_involved=• Citizen and Civil Society<br/>
       |stakeholders_involved=•Citizen and Civil Society<br/>•Policy Makers and Implementers<br/>•Scientists and Research Organization<br/>•Educational Organizations and Students<br/>•Industries and SMEs<br/>•Local Administrations and Municipalities<br/>•Media<br/>
• Policy Makers and Implementers<br/>
  |keywords=marlisco; marine litter; education; consultation; awareness; co-responsability RRI
• Scientists and Research Organization<br/>
• Educational Organizations and Students<br/>
• Industries and SMEs<br/>
• Local Administrations and Municipalities<br/>
• Media
      |keywords=marlisco; marine litter; education; consultation; awareness; co-responsability RRI
}}
}}
</td>
[[Category:VIP RRI Projects]]
</tr>
[[Category: RRI Projects]]
</table>

Latest revision as of 12:26, 8 August 2018

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

The main objectives of the MARLISCO project are to increase the awareness of the consequences of societal behaviour in relation to waste production and management on marine socio-ecological systems, to promote co-responsibility among the different actors, to define a more sustainable collective vision, and to facilitate grounds for concerted actions through the successful implementation of the MMLAP (Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Action Plans on societal challenges). The main focus was to provide and evaluate mechanisms to enable society to perceive the impact of litter on the marine environment, to identify the land-based activities that are involved and collectively arrive at solutions to reduce that impact – in particular solutions that can be implemented locally but have a regional effect.

MARLISCO’ s overarching goal was to raise public awareness, facilitate dialogue and promote co-responsibility among the different actors towards a joint vision for the sustainable management of marine litter across all European seas. MARLICO activities took place in the four European Regional Seas: North-East Atlantic, Baltic, Mediterranean and Black Sea, by a consortium with members located in 15 coastal countries.


RRI FOCUS

Ranking of the most relevant RRI dimensions, where 6 is the most relevant to the project

  • Public engagement
  • Gender Equality
  • Science education
  • Open Access
  • Ethics
  • Governance


PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRI

Which are the most relevant project outcomes (roadmaps, guidelines, documents, reports, articles, videos etc) in terms of RRI?

Output1

MARLISCO Marine Litter Database
Exploitable by GeneralPublic: The MARLISCO project has tried all along the way to find the most suitable means of translating scientific findings into information that key target groups and stakeholders can understand and integrate into their activities.


LESSONS LEARNED

  • What RRI-related difficulties were encountered?

The major challenge of the MARLISCO project was the number and diversity of activities to enable society to perceive the impact of marine litter across Europe.

  • Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties

http://www.marlisco.eu/results.en.html

  • How can the project contribute to improve the quality of the marine environment?

MARLISCO project has brought together different actors in society and their perception of the problem of marine litter, generating solutions to stop the impact of marine litter in European countries.

  • Link to more info on the oucomes

http://www.marlisco.eu/results.en.html

POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED

  • Were policy makers involved in the project and to what extent?

Actions and policies specifically designed to deal with marine litter reduction may be associated with legally-binding or ‘hard’ mechanisms

  • What were the challenges involved?

http://www.marlisco.eu/review-of-existing-policies-that-may-be-applied-to
MARLISCO
Duration 2012-2015
Project coordinator Provincia di Teramo, Italy
Fundings framework FP7
Website http://www.marlisco.eu
Marine Region Focus Baltic Sea Black Sea Mediterranean Sea North-East Atlantic Sea
Marine Related Issues Pollution caused by human, land and sea pressures Maritime, coastal and cruise tourism Coastal urbanization Fishing and aquaculture
Sectors Waste management Education and Research Marine Protected Areas
Themes Marine litter
Stakeholders Involved •Citizen and Civil Society
•Policy Makers and Implementers
•Scientists and Research Organization
•Educational Organizations and Students
•Industries and SMEs
•Local Administrations and Municipalities
•Media
Keyword(s) marlisco; marine litter; education; consultation; awareness; co-responsability RRI
Retrieved from "https://marina-pedia.eu/w/index.php?title=MARLISCO&oldid=2284"