Sea for Society: Difference between revisions

From MARINA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
<table border="1">
<table border="1">
<tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 1</td><td>pla pla pla</td>
<td>Policy brief 1</td><td>Blue Society Policy Brief</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 2</td><td>pla pla pla</td>
<td>Policy brief 2</td><td>Blue Society Summary Document</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 3</td><td>pla pla pla</td>
<td>Policy brief 3</td><td>European Youth Parliament Declaration</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 4</td><td>pla pla pla</td>
<td>Policy brief 4</td><td>Blue Society Stakeholders Commitment</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>Policy brief 5</td><td>pla pla pla</td>
<td>Policy brief 5</td><td>Blue Society Citizen's Promise</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>

Revision as of 00:49, 13 October 2016

General Description

Sea for Society (SFS) engaged stakeholders, citizens and young people in an open and participatory dialogue to share knowledge, forge partnerships and empower society on issues related to the Ocean. The project used this dialogue as a launchpad for strategic cooperation, while developing and enriching the concept of the "Blue Society", a vision for how Ocean issues can be integrated within economic, environmental and cultural challenges facing society in years to come. SFS was a European Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Action Plan (MMLAP) funded by the European Commission’s DG Research & Innovation under the theme Science in Society. The multidisciplinary partnership brought together 28 partners from 12 countries representing marine research institutes, funding agencies, science museums and aquaria, CSOs, higher education institutes and business networks. This dialogue began with thorough multi-stakeholder and citizen consultation on ocean issues in Europe. Following initial research, the Sea for Society team developed a cutting-edge methodology and implemented a full-scale consultation process across 9 countries. The data was compiled and analysed in a series of reports feeding into the mobilisation process, drawing up action plans using the insight gained in the consultation.SFS then went on to mobilise marine researchers, socio-economic stakeholders, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and individual citizens and youth in a mutual learning, open dialogue to debate key societal questions related to the Ocean, extract cross-cutting issues and propose challenge-driven solutions fostering a sustainable management of marine eco-system services by European citizens. From 2012 to 2015, SFS shaped the new concept of "Blue Society" and worked to improve the governance of research related to the oceans and seas, overseen by a Blue Society Expert Group which was launched and managed throughout the project. Communication was a key element, building up to a final event launching the Blue Society concept at the European Parliament. Sea for Society represented a crucial first step for a cross-sectoral dialogue in Europe on the relation between the Ocean and citizens’ daily lives, with a wide-reaching impact far beyond the 42 months of the project. It laid foundations for future co-creation processes in support of responsible research and innovation for societal and marine challenges, for Blue Growth, and for making the Blue Society a reality.


RRI FOCUS

In terms of RRI, what were the main challenges addressed, and to what extent were those challenges met by the project?

Challenge 1 description

How can the public and stakeholders be engaged on a complex, multidisciplinary and wide-ranging topic such as Ocean ecosystem services, in a way which consults them on their views and mobilises them to take action at national and European level?

How Challenge 1 was addressed

Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society.

Challenge 2 Description

Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society.

How Challenge 3 was addressed

Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society.


PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRI

In terms of RRI, what were the main challenges addressed, and to what extent were those challenges met by the project?

Challenge 1 description

How can the public and stakeholders be engaged on a complex, multidisciplinary and wide-ranging topic such as Ocean ecosystem services, in a way which consults them on their views and mobilises them to take action at national and European level?

How Challenge 1 was addressed

Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society.

Challenge 2 Description

Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society.

How Challenge 3 was addressed

Sea for Society conducted the biggest ever consultation of citizens, young people and stakeholders on humans' relationship with the Ocean across 9 regions of Europe, and mobilised the general public and stakeholders en masse in order to work towards the concept of a Blue Society.


LESSONS LEARNED

  • What unexpected RRI-related difficulties did this project encounter, and how were these overcome?
  • Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties
  • How can the outcomes of this project support work towards improved marine status?
  • Link to more info on the outcomes


POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED

Policy brief 1Blue Society Policy Brief
Policy brief 2Blue Society Summary Document
Policy brief 3European Youth Parliament Declaration
Policy brief 4Blue Society Stakeholders Commitment
Policy brief 5Blue Society Citizen's Promise
{{{name}}}
{{{name}}}
Duration write the duration (years (from-to)) of the project
Project coordinator write the coordination (Name, Email and Phone) of the project
Fundings framework write the fundings framework (e.g. SIS, SWAFS, others) of the project
Website write the website of the project
EU Member State write the EU Member State (Enter all that participated)
Non EU-states write the Non EU-states (Enter all that participated)
Marine Region Focus write the Marine Region Focus (Enter all where the project has had actions)
Marine Related Issues write the Marine Related Issues (Enter all that apply)
Sectors write the Sectors (Enter all that apply)
Themes write the Themes (Enter all that apply)
Stakeholders Involved write the Stakeholders Involved
Keyword(s) write keywords (Enter keywords for facilitating the end-user search here)