Sea for Society: Difference between revisions
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
==LESSONS LEARNED== | ==LESSONS LEARNED== | ||
* '''What unexpected RRI-related difficulties did this project encounter, and how were these overcome?''' | * '''What unexpected RRI-related difficulties did this project encounter, and how were these overcome?''' | ||
<p align="justify">The major unexpected challenge of Sea for Society was the wealth of data that the Consultation produced. By entering into dialogue with citizens and stakeholders, we produced extremely valuable content well beyond what we anticipated. The data not only provided solutions to barriers but also gave insight into policy recommendations and many interesting conclusions were drawn by comparing outcomes across geographical areas. As such, the project timeline had to be adapted to make time for additional analysis.</p> | |||
* '''Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties''' | * '''Link to more info on the unexpected difficulties''' | ||
* '''How can the outcomes of this project support work towards improved marine status?''' | * '''How can the outcomes of this project support work towards improved marine status?''' | ||
* '''Link to more info on the outcomes''' | * '''Link to more info on the outcomes''' | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
==POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED== | ==POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED== | ||
<table border="1"> | <table border="1"> |
Revision as of 13:55, 13 October 2016
General DescriptionSea for Society (SFS) engaged stakeholders, citizens and young people in an open and participatory dialogue to share knowledge, forge partnerships and empower society on issues related to the Ocean. The project used this dialogue as a launchpad for strategic cooperation, while developing and enriching the concept of the "Blue Society", a vision for how Ocean issues can be integrated within economic, environmental and cultural challenges facing society in years to come. SFS was a European Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Action Plan (MMLAP) funded by the European Commission’s DG Research & Innovation under the theme Science in Society. The multidisciplinary partnership brought together 28 partners from 12 countries representing marine research institutes, funding agencies, science museums and aquaria, CSOs, higher education institutes and business networks. This dialogue began with thorough multi-stakeholder and citizen consultation on ocean issues in Europe. Following initial research, the Sea for Society team developed a cutting-edge methodology and implemented a full-scale consultation process across 9 countries. The data was compiled and analysed in a series of reports feeding into the mobilisation process, drawing up action plans using the insight gained in the consultation.SFS then went on to mobilise marine researchers, socio-economic stakeholders, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and individual citizens and youth in a mutual learning, open dialogue to debate key societal questions related to the Ocean, extract cross-cutting issues and propose challenge-driven solutions fostering a sustainable management of marine eco-system services by European citizens. From 2012 to 2015, SFS shaped the new concept of "Blue Society" and worked to improve the governance of research related to the oceans and seas, overseen by a Blue Society Expert Group which was launched and managed throughout the project. Communication was a key element, building up to a final event launching the Blue Society concept at the European Parliament. Sea for Society represented a crucial first step for a cross-sectoral dialogue in Europe on the relation between the Ocean and citizens’ daily lives, with a wide-reaching impact far beyond the 42 months of the project. It laid foundations for future co-creation processes in support of responsible research and innovation for societal and marine challenges, for Blue Growth, and for making the Blue Society a reality.
RRI FOCUSIn terms of RRI, what were the main challenges addressed, and to what extent were those challenges met by the project?Expand
Challenge 1 descriptionExpand
How Challenge 1 was addressedExpand
What is the Best Practice for this Challenge?Expand
Name at least one Lesson Learned from this Challenge?
PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRIIn terms of RRI, what were the main challenges addressed, and to what extent were those challenges met by the project?Expand
Challenge 1 descriptionExpand
How Challenge 1 was addressedExpand
Challenge 2 DescriptionExpand
How Challenge 3 was addressed
LESSONS LEARNED
The major unexpected challenge of Sea for Society was the wealth of data that the Consultation produced. By entering into dialogue with citizens and stakeholders, we produced extremely valuable content well beyond what we anticipated. The data not only provided solutions to barriers but also gave insight into policy recommendations and many interesting conclusions were drawn by comparing outcomes across geographical areas. As such, the project timeline had to be adapted to make time for additional analysis.
POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED
|
|