|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <table width="100%"> | | <table width='100%'> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
| <td width="75%" valign="top"> | | <td width='75%' valign='top'> |
| ==GENERAL DESCRIPTION==
| | <h3>GENERAL DESCRIPTION</h3> |
| <p style=<"font-size:95%">Stakeholder involvement is perceived as an important development in the | | <p style='font-size:95%'>Stakeholder involvement is perceived as an important development in the |
| European Common Fisheries Policy. But how can uncertain fisheries | | European Common Fisheries Policy. But how can uncertain fisheries |
| science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing | | science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing |
Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| 1. Analyses of the lessons from participatory modelling studies | | 1. Analyses of the lessons from participatory modelling studies |
| 2. Policy brief on institutions, practices and tools to address complexity, | | 2. Policy brief on institutions, practices and tools to address complexity, |
| uncertainty and ambiguity in participatory fisheries management. | | uncertainty and ambiguity in participatory fisheries management.</p> |
| </p> | |
| <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border:0;text-align:justify;background-color:#ffffff;">
| |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify;">
| |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| </div> | | <h3>RRI FOCUS</h3> |
| </div> | | <h4></h4> |
| <br/><table width="100%"> | | |
| <tr>
| | <h4></h4> |
| <td width="75%" valign="top"> | | <h4></h4> |
| ==GENERAL DESCRIPTION==
| | <h4></h4> |
| <p style=<"font-size:95%">Stakeholder involvement is perceived as an important development in the
| | <h3>Ranking of the most relevant RRI dimensions, where 6 is the most relevant to the project</h3> |
| European Common Fisheries Policy. But how can uncertain fisheries
| | *Public Engagement {{#rating:6|6}} |
| science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing
| | *Gender Equality {{#rating:0|6}} |
| fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the
| | *Science Education {{#rating:5|6}} |
| uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure
| | *Open Access {{#rating:0|6}} |
| of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing
| | *Ethics {{#rating:0|6}} |
| recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of
| | *Governance {{#rating:4|6}} |
| transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility
| |
| of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common
| |
| Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by
| |
| increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies
| |
| and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher
| |
| transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the
| |
| modelling process itself.
| |
| The project Judgement And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders
| |
| (JAKFISH) was a three-year project consisting of 10 partners from the EU
| |
| and Norway. It is a distinctive project in that it provides an integrated
| |
| approach to stakeholder involvement into fisheries management. It aimed
| |
| to examine and develop the institutions, practices and tools that allow
| |
| complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity to be dealt with effectively within
| |
| participatory decision-making processes; to examine how scientific
| |
| information is used and what types of roles scientists play in the
| |
| formulation of policies; to study how the current scientific processes take
| |
| into account the multiobjective nature of fisheries management; and to
| |
| synthesise the obtained views, redefining the institutional role of science to
| |
| improve overall governance in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).
| |
| The synthesis of the project is captured in two main synthesis documents:
| |
| 1. Analyses of the lessons from participatory modelling studies
| |
| 2. Policy brief on institutions, practices and tools to address complexity,
| |
| uncertainty and ambiguity in participatory fisheries management.
| |
| </p> | |
| <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border:0;text-align:justify;background-color:#ffffff;">
| |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify;">
| |
| <br/> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <br/><table width="100%"> | |
| <tr> | |
| <td width="75%" valign="top">
| |
| ==GENERAL DESCRIPTION==
| |
| <p style=<"font-size:95%">Stakeholder involvement is perceived as an important development in the
| |
| European Common Fisheries Policy. But how can uncertain fisheries
| |
| science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing
| |
| fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the
| |
| uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure
| |
| of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing | |
| recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of
| |
| transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility
| |
| of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common
| |
| Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by
| |
| increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies
| |
| and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher
| |
| transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the
| |
| modelling process itself.
| |
| The project Judgement And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders
| |
| (JAKFISH) was a three-year project consisting of 10 partners from the EU
| |
| and Norway. It is a distinctive project in that it provides an integrated
| |
| approach to stakeholder involvement into fisheries management. It aimed
| |
| to examine and develop the institutions, practices and tools that allow
| |
| complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity to be dealt with effectively within
| |
| participatory decision-making processes; to examine how scientific
| |
| information is used and what types of roles scientists play in the
| |
| formulation of policies; to study how the current scientific processes take
| |
| into account the multiobjective nature of fisheries management; and to
| |
| synthesise the obtained views, redefining the institutional role of science to
| |
| improve overall governance in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).
| |
| The synthesis of the project is captured in two main synthesis documents:
| |
| 1. Analyses of the lessons from participatory modelling studies
| |
| 2. Policy brief on institutions, practices and tools to address complexity,
| |
| uncertainty and ambiguity in participatory fisheries management.
| |
| </p> | |
| <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border:0;text-align:justify;background-color:#ffffff;">
| |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify;">
| |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| </div> | | <h3>PROJECT OUTCOMES RELATED TO RRI</h3> |
| </div> | | <h4></h4> |
| <br/><table width="100%"> | | <ul></ul> |
| <tr> | | <ul></ul> |
| <td width="75%" valign="top"> | | <ul></ul> |
| ==GENERAL DESCRIPTION==
| | <ul></ul> |
| <p style=<"font-size:95%">Stakeholder involvement is perceived as an important development in the | | <ul></ul> |
| European Common Fisheries Policy. But how can uncertain fisheries
| | <ul></ul> |
| science be linked with good governance processes, thereby increasing
| |
| fisheries management legitimacy and effectiveness? Reducing the
| |
| uncertainties around scientific models has long been perceived as the cure
| |
| of the fisheries management problem. There is however increasing
| |
| recognition that uncertainty in the numbers will remain. A lack of
| |
| transparency with respect to these uncertainties can damage the credibility
| |
| of science. The EU Commission’s proposal for a reformed Common
| |
| Fisheries Policy calls for more self-management for the fishing industry by
| |
| increasing fishers’ involvement in the planning and execution of policies
| |
| and boosting the role of fishers’ organisations. One way of higher
| |
| transparency and improved participation is to include stakeholders in the
| |
| modelling process itself.
| |
| The project Judgement And Knowledge in Fisheries Involving Stakeholders
| |
| (JAKFISH) was a three-year project consisting of 10 partners from the EU
| |
| and Norway. It is a distinctive project in that it provides an integrated
| |
| approach to stakeholder involvement into fisheries management. It aimed
| |
| to examine and develop the institutions, practices and tools that allow
| |
| complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity to be dealt with effectively within
| |
| participatory decision-making processes; to examine how scientific
| |
| information is used and what types of roles scientists play in the
| |
| formulation of policies; to study how the current scientific processes take
| |
| into account the multiobjective nature of fisheries management; and to
| |
| synthesise the obtained views, redefining the institutional role of science to
| |
| improve overall governance in the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).
| |
| The synthesis of the project is captured in two main synthesis documents:
| |
| 1. Analyses of the lessons from participatory modelling studies
| |
| 2. Policy brief on institutions, practices and tools to address complexity,
| |
| uncertainty and ambiguity in participatory fisheries management.
| |
| </p> | |
| <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border:0;text-align:justify;background-color:#ffffff;"> | |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify;"> | |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| </div> | | <h3></h3> |
| </div> | | <h4></h4> |
| | <h4></h4> |
| | <h4></h4> |
| | <h4></h4> |
| | <h4></h4> |
| | <h4></h4> |
| | <br/><h4>LESSONS LEARNED</h4> |
| | <ul></ul> |
| | <p align='justify'></p> |
| | <ul></ul> |
| | <p align='justify'></p> |
| | <ul></ul> |
| | <p align='justify'></p> |
| | <ul></ul> |
| | <p align='justify'></p> |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
|
| |
|
| ==RRI FOCUS== | | <h3>POLICY RELATED LESSONS LEARNED</h3> |
| ===In terms of RRI, what were the main challenges addressed, and to what extent were those challenges met by the project?=== | | <ul></ul> |
| <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;"> | | <p align='justify'> </p> |
| <h4>Challenge 1 description</h4> | | <ul> </ul> |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify">div> | | <p align='justify'></p> |
| </div> | | <ul> </ul> |
| <!-- Copy the below code up to the point where it says end of code and paste it just below it --> | | <br/> |
| <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="border-radius: 5px; border: 2px solid #33abdf;"> | | <table border='1'> |
| <h4>How Challenge 1 was addressed</h4> | | <tr> |
| <div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align:justify"> </div> | | <td colspan='4'><b><font color='#000000'>Main policy briefs produced by the project and related URL</font></b></td> |
| </div> | | </tr> |
| | <tr> |
| | <td>Policy brief 1</td><td></td> |
| | </tr> |
| | <tr> |
| | <td>Policy brief 2</td><td></td> |
| | </tr> |
| | <tr> |
| | <td>Policy brief 3</td><td></td> |
| | </tr> |
| | <tr> |
| | <td>Policy brief 4</td><td></td> |
| | </tr> |
| | <tr> |
| | <td>Policy brief 5</td><td></td> |
| | </tr> |
| | </table> |
| | </td> |
| | <td width='25%' valign='top'> |
| | {{Best Practices |
| | |name=JAKFISH |
| | |logo= |
| | |general_description= |
| | |duration=2008-2011 |
| | |project_coordinator= |
| | |fundings_framework= FP7 |
| | |website= |
| | |eu_member_state= |
| | |non_eu_states= |
| | |marine_region_focus= |
| | |marine_related_issues= |
| | |sectors= |
| | |stakeholders_involved= |
| | |keywords=Participatory research; Participatory modelling; fisheries; fisheries management; governance; stakeholders; engagement; advisory councils; fishermen; uncertainty; stock assessment |
| | }} |
| | </td> |
| | </tr> |
| | </table> |